<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designing for Modern Monitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/</link>
	<description>Carefully crafted banter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael coyle</title>
		<link>http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>michael coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redswish.co.uk/design/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>bit behind the times on this post, i didn&#039;t think designers have been workin with 800x600 for the last 2 years. 1024x768 and 1280x1024 are the most popular with the rest spreading out over larger widescreen resolutions, a good size is 950px wide so you can still see the edges but the most you&#039;d want to go would be 990.

I use Google analytics on quite a few different sites with different target audiences and 800x600 is almost non-existent these days. And anyway, people with that resolution should be used to not seeing the whole website anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bit behind the times on this post, i didn&#8217;t think designers have been workin with 800&#215;600 for the last 2 years. 1024&#215;768 and 1280&#215;1024 are the most popular with the rest spreading out over larger widescreen resolutions, a good size is 950px wide so you can still see the edges but the most you&#8217;d want to go would be 990.</p>
<p>I use Google analytics on quite a few different sites with different target audiences and 800&#215;600 is almost non-existent these days. And anyway, people with that resolution should be used to not seeing the whole website anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redswish.co.uk/design/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>@Martyn P - that is indeed true. However the difference isn&#039;t going to be huge. If we were talking about browser usage then I&#039;d agree with you, but monitor resolutions aren&#039;t as directly favourable towards different professions as other variables.

I know plenty of web designers on 17&quot; monitors, and I know several &#039;grannies&#039; on 19&quot;. The fact of the matter is that there is an obvious drop in smaller screen resolutions so let&#039;s stop restricting both design and owners of bigger monitors for the sake of a minority.

And if you&#039;re designing a website for older or disabled people, there&#039;s lots to consider as well as monitor resolution - perhaps I&#039;ll write an article on the subject soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Martyn P &#8211; that is indeed true. However the difference isn&#8217;t going to be huge. If we were talking about browser usage then I&#8217;d agree with you, but monitor resolutions aren&#8217;t as directly favourable towards different professions as other variables.</p>
<p>I know plenty of web designers on 17&#8243; monitors, and I know several &#8216;grannies&#8217; on 19&#8243;. The fact of the matter is that there is an obvious drop in smaller screen resolutions so let&#8217;s stop restricting both design and owners of bigger monitors for the sake of a minority.</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re designing a website for older or disabled people, there&#8217;s lots to consider as well as monitor resolution &#8211; perhaps I&#8217;ll write an article on the subject soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martyn P</title>
		<link>http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redswish.co.uk/design/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got to remember that the visitors to W3schools are not an average audience. I bet you don&#039;t find many grannies visiting that site. So if you&#039;re designing a site for them, this data doesn&#039;t really apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got to remember that the visitors to W3schools are not an average audience. I bet you don&#8217;t find many grannies visiting that site. So if you&#8217;re designing a site for them, this data doesn&#8217;t really apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redswish.co.uk/design/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I think what we will see in the future when screens get larger and wider. there will be more designs that use left floating divs that move content to fill the entire screen with out being flex-ie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what we will see in the future when screens get larger and wider. there will be more designs that use left floating divs that move content to fill the entire screen with out being flex-ie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redswish.co.uk/design/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Good article. I agree with everything you are saying. One thing that annoys me though is websites that are fixed width but aren&#039;t centered. They just sit on the left of your screen. It really makes a site look bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. I agree with everything you are saying. One thing that annoys me though is websites that are fixed width but aren&#8217;t centered. They just sit on the left of your screen. It really makes a site look bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redswish.co.uk/design/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>yep absolutely, with all the web designer toolbars (web developer, google, roboform, bookmarks etc) that knocks a huge area of my viewing window... always worth bearing in mind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep absolutely, with all the web designer toolbars (web developer, google, roboform, bookmarks etc) that knocks a huge area of my viewing window&#8230; always worth bearing in mind <img src='http://redswish.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren T</title>
		<link>http://redswish.co.uk/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redswish.co.uk/design/designing-for-modern-monitors/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Always worth bearing in mind that &#039;the fold&#039; will shift vertically, depending on the number of additional toolbars a user has loaded into their browser and is currently displaying - so that can be a variable with a pretty wide range as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always worth bearing in mind that &#8216;the fold&#8217; will shift vertically, depending on the number of additional toolbars a user has loaded into their browser and is currently displaying &#8211; so that can be a variable with a pretty wide range as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

